Legal AI tools used by law firms have a propensity to hallucinate—can anything be done?
Third, the AI-nativity gap. Partners evaluating AI-assisted work are, on average, overseeing output produced by tools they use less fluently than the associates producing it. The distribution is real but bimodal, and the claim is about averages. The usual quality-assurance intuition that makes partnerships work, where the senior partner is more skilled at every task than his or her associates, is poorly calibrated for this type of failure.
Post Comment